Offtaker Credit Score

Score the company paying for the GPUs, from 0 to 100.

What it scores

For lenders weighing a deal backed by a compute contract. The score rates the buyer on its finances, its funding, the contract it signed, how much it depends on the capacity, its business and its payment record, then maps the result to a rating band and the advance lenders usually give.

The quickest check: the buyer’s total funding should be at least 2x the total contract value.

Pick a buyer below and change the contract terms to see what moves the score.

Calculator

Buyer
20% of the contract
0 months
Fine-tune
Commitment
The buyer can leave
Investment-grade backstop

Offtaker Credit Score, Microsoft

86/ 100 · AC-1 Prime

A five-year GPU capacity contract on IREN's terms: about $9.7B, 20% of each tranche prepaid before delivery

Indicative rating
BBB- or better
One-year default
About 0.15% or less
Advance
75-80%

By pillar

Financial strength
30.0 / 30
Funding quality
10.0 / 10
Contract structure
15.3 / 25
Concentration and dependency
15.0 / 15
Business quality
9.8 / 12
Track record
6.4 / 8

Get the full model as a spreadsheet

All 22 factors with live formulas, plus a month-by-month contract stress test.

Microsoft, OpenAI and CoreWeave from 2026 filings. The other buyers are hypothetical.

Why the buyer sets the price

A GPU loan is repaid from the offtake contract. If the buyer stops paying, the lender is left with servers that lose value every month.

Lenders price it that way. In March 2026 CoreWeave’s $8.5 billion GPU loan, secured by the GPUs and a contract with a “leading AI enterprise,” was rated A3 by Moody’s. CoreWeave itself is rated Ba3, six notches lower.

Five tiers

TierScoreIndicative ratingOne-year defaultAdvance
AC-1 Prime85-100BBB- or betterAbout 0.15% or less75-80% of equipment cost
AC-2 Strong70-84BB+ to BB0.3-0.6%65-75%
AC-3 Acceptable55-69BB- to B+0.6-3%55-65%
AC-4 Weak40-54B to B-3-8%Up to 50%
AC-5 Speculative0-39CCC+ and belowOver 8%Not usually lent against

Source: S&P long-run corporate default study.

Six pillars, 100 points

Financial strength (30)
Can the buyer pay the rest of the contract from money it has or has been promised?
Contract structure (25)
The same buyer is a different credit under a take-or-pay contract with a 20% prepayment than under on-demand terms it can walk away from.
Concentration and dependency (15)
How big this contract is next to the buyer's revenue and its other commitments, and whether the workload is one the buyer cannot switch off.
Business quality (12)
Growth, gross margin and customer spread say whether today's revenue is durable.
Funding quality (10)
How reliably the buyer can raise again.
Track record (8)
Has the buyer paid other compute and data center vendors on time, for how long, and without disputes?

What caps the score

WhenBest possible tier
Liquidity covers less than half the remaining contractAC-4
Liquidity covers less than the remaining contractAC-2
Under 6 months of funded runwayAC-5
Under 12 months of funded runwayAC-4
No minimum commitmentAC-4
Termination for convenience without a feeAC-3
Missed payments or default in the last 24 monthsAC-4
Open payment dispute with a vendor or lenderAC-3
No financials sharedAC-4
Management accounts onlyAC-2

Examples

Microsoft: 86, AC-1 Prime
Prime on balance sheet alone. Its liquidity covers the remaining payments about ten times, and the contract is under 1% of revenue. Source
OpenAI: 65, AC-3 Acceptable
Acceptable, held down by about $1.4T of commitments against roughly $92B of committed capital and no disclosed prepayment. A 20% prepayment and a 6-month letter of credit would lift it to Strong. Source
CoreWeave: 63, AC-3 Acceptable
Acceptable, the same band as its agency ratings (Moody's Ba3, S&P B+). Cash covers about half the 15-year lease; leverage and Microsoft concentration cost points. Source

Discuss a transaction

Send us the buyer and the contract. We will come back with a score and the questions we would need answered.

Prefer email? hello@amcompute.com